Showing posts with label lieberman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label lieberman. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Lieberman Stands in Middle of Health Care Debate

free image host free image host
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. and Sen. Susan Collins., R-Maine meet with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington,

free image host
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., right, accompanied by Sen. Susan Collins, Maine meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009.

free image host
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn. meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009.

free image host free image host
Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., right, accompanied by Sen. Susan Collins, Maine meets with reporters on Capitol Hill in Washington, Tuesday, Dec. 15, 2009.

The senator Republicans love and liberals love to hate is at it again.

Sen. Joe Lieberman, who no longer considers himself a Democrat but is holding tight to a coveted chairmanship, thoroughly rattled the Obama administration and his colleagues in the last 48 hours when he threatened to join Republicans in blocking health care overhaul over government-run insurance and an expansion of Medicare.

"Say it ain't so, Joe," Vice President Joe Biden said Tuesday on MSNBC's "Morning Joe." "I think Joe's judgment is wrong."

Don't count me as a "no" vote just yet, Lieberman indicated Tuesday.

As long as any government plan or Medicare expansion stays out of the bill, "then I'm going to be in a position where I can say what I've wanted to say all along: that I'm ready to vote for health care reform," the Connecticut lawmaker told reporters.

Lieberman isn't the typical Democrat the party machinery is primed to appease as President Barack Obama and Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., cobble together the 60 votes required to pass a health care bill.

No, this is Lieberman — Democratic presidential candidate Al Gore's running mate in 2000 but now independent in every sense of the word. Lieberman lost his party's primary in 2006 in part because of his pro-Iraq war votes and won re-election as an Independent.

Then he committed what some Democrats still consider the ultimate apostasy: He endorsed Republican Sen. John McCain of Arizona with a rousing speech at the GOP national convention and campaigned heartily for his longtime friend.

Back in the Senate with McCain — after Obama moved into the White House — Lieberman later apologized to his Democratic colleagues. Seething but needing Lieberman to get to the 60 vote-majority required to break filibusters, they allowed him to keep the chairmanship of the Homeland Security Committee.

From Obama on down, they vowed to step past the unpleasantness and look to the future.

But there held another chapter in Lieberman's tortured relationship with Democrats.

By Tuesday, Lieberman was telling Obama and his colleagues that the debate has been tough on him. Outside with reporters, he blamed the tussle on Democrats trying to cram too much — namely, any kind of government health insurance — into the overhaul

"What happens then is you run the risk of losing everything," Lieberman told reporters.

That's exactly what Democrats feared was happening on Sunday, when they heard Lieberman call the latest iteration of their bill, a plan to allow people age 55 to 64 to buy Medicare benefits, too costly.

There, potentially, went Reid's 60th vote, a development that unnerved Democrats at both ends of Pennsylvania Avenue and must have come in some measure as a surprise to Reid. Only two months earlier, the majority leader had called Lieberman "the least of Harry Reid's problems."

By Monday, Lieberman headed Reid's list of senators who must be accommodated. Democrats circulated a videotaped newspaper interview from September showing Lieberman saying he supports the idea of a Medicare expansion. Lieberman said in a statement later that the details of the bill had changed since then and so had his opinion.

The White House got involved, and by nightfall, the Medicare provision was out. And Lieberman sounded like he was back in.

At a private White House complex meeting with Senate Democrats Tuesday, Lieberman said Obama greeted him warmly.

"He said 'hello, how are you brother?' It was a good conversation," recalled the senator, who in an interview with CNN signaled he could switch parties again. "It's unlikely I'd run as a Republican, but I wouldn't foreclose any possibility. I think the more likely thing is that I'd run as an Independent because that's what I am," he said.

Congressional Democrats, both furious and wary of re-offending their mercurial colleague, began speaking of Lieberman only when asked, mostly in the bland terms.

What was Lieberman thinking?

"I have no idea," Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., said with a polite grin. "Our focus is on 60 votes."

Does he have too much power over the shape of the overhaul?

"That's a Senate matter," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., demurred.

"You're too Lieberman-focused," Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., told reporters afterward.

Lieberman himself said later that he's prepared to live with his opposition to publicly funded insurance, convinced, he said, that it would increase taxes.

It's a truism about the Senate that the end of sensitive negotiations present outsized opportunities for clout and attention for any senator with a request or a demand. Power in this debate has flowed largely to those on the fence or in the middle. But while senators like being courted, the position can be uncomfortable.

Inside Obama's closed-door meeting at the White House complex Tuesday, Lieberman stood.

"I said, 'I haven't really had a lot of fun the last couple of weeks,'" the besieged senator told reporters.

"And then (Ohio Democratic Sen.) Sherrod Brown got up and said, 'I haven't been having fun either,'" Lieberman recalled. "And the president said, 'Why don't we all begin to have some fun? Let's pass the bill."


-----------

---------

-----------

RELATED POSTS:-


Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Israeil halt constuctions.Now Palestine are expected to response to Peace Talk.


Israel considers all of Jerusalem as its "eternal, indivisible" capital


A Palestinian laborer clears the debris from a construction site of a new housing project


Jewish settlers build West Bank outpost at Maoz Ester.


Palestinians want a freeze on all settlement activity before restarting peace talks with Israel


Israel has been turning a deaf ear to international calls for a complete freeze on its construction activity on the occupied Palestinian lands in the West Bank.


Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman on Thursday said it was up to the Palestinians to decide whether peace negotiations resume, after Israel announced on Wednesday 10-month halt in West Bank settlement construction.

"We've contributed what we could contribute; the Palestinians will make their considerations based on internal considerations that don't need to concern us," Lieberman told Army Radio. "The ball is now in the Palestinian court."

The minister was echoing comments made by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shortly after he announced the moratorium. The premier said Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas now had "no more excuses" to avoid renewing peace negotiations with Israel.

Washington welcomed Netanyahu's offer, but the Palestinians swiftly rejected it because it did not include a building freeze in Jewish neighborhoods in east Jerusalem, the mainly Arab sector of the city they want as the capital of a future state.

The United States has been urging the sides to resume peace talks and said the Israeli move could help them do so

The Obama administration welcomed Israel's temporary freeze of settlement building Wednesday as a way to revive Middle East peace talks, despite its long struggle to break the deadlock.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Israel's announcement "helps move forward toward resolving the Israeli-Palestinian conflict," and reiterated what she called "unwavering" US support for a two-state solution.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu offered to freeze new building projects in the occupied West Bank for 10 months, but excluded the construction of public buildings and all construction within mostly Arab east Jerusalem.

The Palestinians immediately rejected the offer as insufficient.

They have demanded east Jerusalem -- which Israel occupied and annexed following the 1967 Six-Day War in a move not recognized by the international community -- as the capital of their future state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

"Netanyahu did not advance any formula for the relaunching of negotiations," chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erakat told AFP.

Clinton's top aides insisted that while President Barack Obama's administration stands by its calls for a full settlement freeze in both in the West Bank and east Jerusalem, the Israeli move is "significant."

In a press conference immediately after Clinton's written statement was released, US Middle East envoy George Mitchell said the Israeli move could pave the way for a resumption of peace talks suspended for nearly a year.

"It falls short of a full settlement freeze, but it is more than any Israeli government has done before, and can help move toward agreement between the parties," Mitchell told reporters.

He avoided using the word "unprecedented," after Clinton infuriated the Palestinians by using it on October 31 to describe Netanyahu's offer to "restrict" but not freeze settlement building on the West Bank.

Mitchell said the temporary freeze is "significant" and will "have an impact on the ground," as he highlighted the unprecedented nature of the Israeli government's move.

Some public buildings like synagogues and schools within settlements will be exempted, while buildings already under construction will be completed, he acknowledged.

But overall construction will decline, said Mitchell, a former troubleshooter in the Northern Ireland peace process.

"So implementation of the moratorium could mean much less settlement construction than would occur if there is no moratorium," he said.

Clinton stressed the need to relaunch talks for a Palestinian state living alongside a secure Israel -- which were suspended when Israel launched a deadly 22-day offensive against Hamas militants in Gaza that ended in January.

"Let me say to all the people of the region and world: our commitment to achieving a solution with two states living side by side in peace and security is unwavering," the chief US diplomat said.

Analysts like former US negotiator Aaron David Miller have accused the Obama administration of getting bogged down in a vain bid to halt Israeli settlements instead of using its muscle to solve core issues like borders, refugees and Jerusalem.

Since taking office 10 months ago, the administration has put high priority on resolving the conflict as part of a broader effort to boost US national security by improving ties with Arab and Muslim nations.


----------------

-------------------
RELATED POSTS:-

Today Top Recent Posts Here.


Blogger Widgets
Related Posts with Thumbnails

Entertainment News